On the Contrary: Special Nevada Caucus for Talmud believers

On the Contrary: Special Nevada Caucus for Talmud believers

Sehr gut von Herrn Hoffman.

_______________________

Der Talmud ist satanisch Buch der Lügen.

_______________________

Der Antisemitismus:

Eine moderne Form der Gotteslästerung
oder die unausbleibliche Folge jüdischen Verhaltens?

In der heutigen Zeit wird jedem, der Juden oder die Politik des Staates Israel kritisiert, geradezu reflexartig unterstellt, er sei ein Antisemit. Gleichzeitig wollen selbsternannte moralische Instanzen vom Schlage eines Michel Friedman der Öffentlichkeit weismachen, der Antisemitismus sei eine vollkommen unerklärliche und irrationale Erscheinung. Die Juden stießen angeblich seit jeher nur deshalb auf Ablehnung, weil sie eben Juden seien.

Die naheliegende Frage, ob der Antisemitismus eventuell auch auf das Verhalten der Juden selbst zurückzuführen sein könnte, wird von den Meinungswächtern der "political correctness" zurückgewiesen, als handle es sich um eine moderne Form der Gotteslästerung. Doch der Zionist Bernard Lazare ging in seinem 1894 erschienenen Buch "Der Antisemitismus, seine Geschichte und seine Ursachen" dieser Frage genauer nach und kam zu folgender Einsicht:

"Falls es die Abneigung gegen Juden nur in einem Land oder nur zu einer bestimmten Zeit gegeben hätte, wäre es leicht, die Ursache hierfür zu ergründen. Aber die Juden waren seit jeher das Ziel des Hasses aller Völker gewesen, wo auch immer sie sich in nennenswerter Anzahl niederließen. Die Juden stießen bei den unterschiedlichsten Völkern, mit den unterschiedlichsten Sitten und Gebräuchen, in weit voneinander entfernten Gebieten, auf Ablehnung. Daher müssen die Gründe für den Antisemitismus immer bei den Juden selbst bestanden haben und nicht bei denen, die ihnen ablehnend gegenüberstehen."

Wer also die wahren Ursachen des Antisemitismus ergründen will, kommt nicht umhin, sich etwas genauer mit der spirituellen Heimat der Juden zu befassen. Beihttp://www.judentum.org/ erfahren wir hierüber folgendes:

"Das Herz der jüdischen Eigenart und das Wesen des jüdischen Volkes liegt in einem Werk verborgen, das als Talmud bekannt ist. Der Talmud ist der Kern des Judentums. Verständnis des Talmud ist Verständnis des Judentums…"

Was liegt also näher als den Talmud zu Rate zu ziehen, um das Geheimnis der jüdischen Eigenart zu ergründen? Doch schon ein flüchtiger Blick in das Heilige Buch der Juden läßt erahnen, warum bereits Martin Luther den Talmud ein "Buch voller Abgötterei, Fluch und Lästerung" nannte. Es folgen einige Zitate aus dem Talmud, in Klammern ist das jeweilige Traktat angegeben.

"Die Güter der Nichtjuden gleichen der Wüste, sie sind ein herrenloses Gut und jeder, der zuerst von ihnen Besitz nimmt, erwirbt sie." (Baba bathra 54b)

"Dem Juden ist es erlaubt zum Nichtjuden zu gehen, diesen zu täuschen und mit ihm Handel zu treiben, ihn zu hintergehen und sein Geld zu nehmen. Denn das Vermögen des Nichtjuden ist als Gemeineigentum anzusehen und es gehört dem ersten [Juden], der es sich sichern kann." (Baba kamma 113a)

"Wenn sich ein Nichtjude mit der Thora befaßt, so verdient er den Tod." (Synhedrin 59a)

"Die Wohnung eines Nichtjuden wird nicht als Wohnung betrachtet." (Erubin 75a)

"Den besten der Gojim sollst du töten." (Kiduschin 40b)

"Weshalb sind die Nichtjuden schmutzig? Weil sie am Berge Sinaj nicht gestanden haben. Als nämlich die Schlange der Chava beiwohnte, impfte sie ihr einen Schmutz ein; bei den Jisraéliten, die am Berge Sinaj gestanden haben, verlor sich der Schmutz, bei den Nichtjuden aber verlor er sich nicht." (Aboda zara 22b)

"Sobald der Messias kommt, sind alle [Nichtjuden] Sklaven der Jisraéliten." (Erubin 43b)

"Wer die Scharen der Gojim sieht, spreche: Beschämt ist eure Mutter, zu Schande die euch geboren hat." (Berakhoth 58a)

"Wer die Gräber der Gojim sieht, spreche: Beschämt ist eure Mutter, zu Schande die euch geboren hat." (Berakhoth, 58b)

"Eher gib einem Jisraéliten umsonst als einem Nichtjuden auf Wucher." (Baba mezia 71a)

"Ihr aber seid meine Schafe, die Schafe meiner Weide, Menschen seid ihr, ihr heißt Menschen, nicht aber heißen die weltlichen Völker [also die Nichtjuden] Menschen, sondern Vieh." (Baba mezia 114b)

"Der Samen der Nichtjuden ist Viehsamen." (Jabmuth 94b)

"Der Beischlaf der Nichtjuden ist wie Beischlaf der Viecher." (Aboda zara 22b)

"Ein Mädchen von drei Jahren und einem Tag ist zum Beischlaf geeignet." (Jabmuth 57b, Jabmuth 60 a, Aboda zara 37a)

"Der Notzüchter braucht kein Schmerzensgeld zu zahlen, weil das Mädchen diese Schmerzen später unter ihrem Ehemann gehabt haben würde." (Baba kamma 59a)

"Wenn jemand wünscht, daß seine Gelübde des ganzen Jahres nichtig seien, so spreche er am Beginn des Jahres: jedes Gelübde das ich tun werde, ist nichtig; nur muß er beim Geloben daran denken." (Nedarim 23b)

Die meisten Menschen reagieren auf diese Talmud-Zitate mit einer Mischung aus Nicht-Glauben-Wollen und Entsetzen. Nachfolgend werden die häufigsten Entgegnungen beantwortet:

1.) Diese Zitate sind gefälscht!
Antwort: Seit Jahrhunderten versuchten jüdische Religionsgelehrte mit diesem fadenscheinigen Einwand von den rassistischen und volksverhetzenden Aussagen des Talmud abzulenken. Doch spätestens seitdem einer der ihrigen den Talmud ins Deutsche übersetzt hat, kann jeder die oben zitierten Stellen hier nachlesen: Der Babylonische Talmud. Erste vollständige und zensurfreie Übersetzung ins Deutsche von Lazarus Goldschmidt, Jüdischer Verlag Frankfurt (ISBN 3-633-54200-0). Eine Übersetzung des Talmud ist Englische ist online abrufbar: www.come-and-hear.com/talmud

2.) Diese Zitate sind aus dem Zusammenhang gerissen!
Antwort: In welchem Zusammenhang bitteschön wären die hier zitierten Aussagen mit heutigen Vorstellungen von Ethik, Moral und Anstand vereinbar? Wer bemängelt, es würden nur einige wenige Stellen aus einem ca. 10.000 Seiten umfassenden Werk zitiert, der mache sich die Mühe, das Original etwas genauer zu studieren. So wird alleine im Traktat "Aboda zara" über 500 mal auf Nichtjuden Bezug genommen, und in keinem einzigen Fall handelt es sich um freundliche Formulierungen. Auch im übrigen Talmud findet man keine einzige Stelle, wo Juden zu ethischem oder gar barmherzigen Verhalten gegenüber Nichtjuden aufgerufen werden. Dies ist auch nicht weiter verwunderlich, denn nach talmudischer Auslegung der Thora (= die fünf Bücher Mose im Alten Testament) gelten die Zehn Gebote nur für Juden untereinander, nicht aber für das Verhalten von Juden gegenüber Nichtjuden.

3.) Diese Zitatensammlung ist antisemitisch!
Antwort: Dies ist ein Paradebeispiel dafür, wie gedankenlos und inflationär mit dem Vorwurf des Antisemitismus umgegangen wird. Es ist ja wohl kaum möglich, daß der Talmud, das heiligste Buch der Juden, "antisemitische" Aussagen enthält. Ist es nicht vielmehr so, daß der Judaismus geprägt ist von Haß und Intoleranz gegenüber Nichtjuden? Vor diesem Hintergrund ist die Haltung eines jeden Nichtjuden, der die talmudische Ideologie durchschaut hat, per Definition antisemitisch.

4.) Ja, aber die Bibel ist um keinen Deut besser!
Antwort: Dieser Einwand ist durchaus berechtigt, sofern das Alte Testament gemeint ist, schließlich ist der Talmud nichts weiter als die rabbinische Interpretation der Thora. Hier wird an vielen Stellen davon berichtet, daß die Israeliten andere Völker ausgerottet ("den Bann an ihnen vollstreckt") haben, um ihrem zornigen, strafenden Gott Jahwe ein Opfer zu bringen (siehe u.a.: 4.Mos 21,3; 5.Mos 3,6; 13,16; Jos 6,21; 8,26; 11,11-21; Ri 1,17; 21,11; 2.Sam 12,31; 1.Chr 4,41; Jes 34,2-5 Jer 25,9; 50,21; 50,26).

Hingegen ist die im Neuen Testament verkündigte Lehre der Liebe, Barmherzigkeit und Vergebung eine diametrale Abkehr vom sprichwörtlichen alttestamentarischen Haß und vom Auserwähltheitsgedanken der Hebräer. Nichts macht den Gegensatz zwischen dem Alten Testament und dem Neuen Testament deutlicher als die Rede Jesu Christi an die Juden:

"Ihr habt den Teufel zum Vater, und nach eures Vaters Gelüste wollt ihr tun. Der ist ein Mörder von Anfang an und steht nicht in der Wahrheit; denn die Wahrheit ist nicht in ihm. Wenn er Lügen redet, so spricht er aus dem Eigenen; denn er ist ein Lügner und der Vater der Lüge." (Joh 8,44)

5.) Gerade wir Deutsche dürfen wegen unserer Vergangenheit die Juden nicht kritisieren!
Antwort: Selbst wenn die offizielle Darstellung des Holocaust zutreffend sein sollte, und daran gibt es erhebliche Zweifel (siehe: www.radioislam.net/mh.pdf ), gibt das niemandem das Recht, als Antwort auf berechtigte Kritik auf ein längst vergangenes Kapitel der Geschichte zu verweisen.

6.) Die über tausend Jahre alten Aussagen des Talmud spielen für Juden von heute nicht die geringste Rolle!
Antwort: Dem steht entgegen, daß Rabbiner heute noch die zentrale Bedeutung des Talmud für das Judentum bei jeder sich bietenden Gelegenheit hervorheben, siehe auch das bereits erwähnte Zitat von www.judentum.org. Auch folgende Äußerungen aus jüngerer Zeit legen den Schluß nahe, daß die talmudische Ideologie heute nach wie vor die spirituelle Heimat der Juden ist:

"Die Seelen der Gojim [Nichtjuden] sind von ganz anderer, minderer Art. Alle Juden sind von Natur gut, alle Gojim von Natur böse. Die Juden sind die Krone der Schöpfung, die Gojim ihr Abschaum." (Rabbi Shneur Zalman, einer der einflußreichsten Talmudgelehrten unserer Zeit, FAZ, 11. 3. 1994)

"Araber sind Tiere, keine Menschen. Ihr Fleisch ist das Fleisch von Eseln, deshalb sollten sie wie Tiere behandelt werden." (Sharon Kalimi, SZ, 3. 3. 1999)

"Im Lande Israel hat kein Araber das Recht zu existieren. Ganz klar, Araber stehen auf der Kulturleiter der Welt weit unten. Goldsteins Tat [29 Nichtjuden zu ermorden] stellt die Erfüllung einiger Gebote des jüdischen Gesetzes dar. Dazu gehört auch, Rache an Nichtjuden zu üben." (Rabbi Jizchak Ginsburg, Ha'aretz vom 5. 11. 2003)

"Wenn ein Jude eine Leber benötigt, erlaubt die Thora wahrscheinlich, einem gerade vorbeikommenden Nichtjuden die Leber gewaltsam zu entnehmen. Jüdisches Leben ist unendlich viel heiliger und einmaliger als nichtjüdisches." (Rabbi Jizchak Ginsburg, zitiert in: Israel Shahak, "Jewish Fundamentalism")

"Die Palästinenser sind Tiere auf zwei Beinen!" (Menahim Begin, ehem. israelischer Premierminister, New Statesman, 25. 6. 1982)

"Wir, das jüdische Volk, kontrollieren Amerika, und die Amerikaner wissen das." (Ariel Sharon, israelischer Premierminister im Radiosender Kol Yisrael, 3. 10. 2001)

"Wir werden die Palästinenser vernichten wie die Heuschrecken und ihre Köpfe gegen die Wand schlagen" (Friedensnobelpreisträger (!) Yitzak Rabin, ehemaliger israelischer Premierminister, New York Times, 1.4.1988)

"Die jüdische Lehre ist rassistisch, und das ist gut so." (Rechavam Zeevi, ehem. israelischer Tourismusminister, SZ, 27. 10. 2001). Derselbe im israelischen Armeeradio: ''Wir sollten die Palästinenser auf gleiche Weise entfernen wie man Läuse loswird."

"Warum sind die Juden im Geschäftsleben überall auf der Welt unglaublich erfolgreich, außer in Israel? In Israel gibt es nicht genug Gojim, will heißen Trottel, die darauf warten, betrogen zu werden. Wenn alle um den Ball stehen, kann keiner ein Tor schießen." (Chaim Bermant, israelischer Schriftsteller)

Soweit einige Zitate von einflußreichen Juden aus jüngerer Zeit. Auch folgende Verhaltensweisen scheinen eher vom talmudischen Geist geprägt zu sein als von allgemein akzeptierten Ideen von Ethik, Toleranz und Humanismus:

Terror- und Apartheidsregime Israel:
Diejenigen, die sich heute Juden nennen, (also überwiegend Abkömmlinge des zentralasiatischen Volkes der Khasaren) rechtfertigen die brutale Vertreibung der Palästinenser aus ihrer angestammten Heimat mit dem scheinheiligen Argument, ihr Gott Jahwe habe das "Heilige Land" ausschließlich ihnen geschenkt. Im Staat, der sich Israel (zu deutsch: "Gottesstreiter") nennt, sind, ganz nach Manier der Nürnberger Rassengesetze von 1935, Eheschließungen zwischen Juden und Nichtjuden verboten. Israel schickt nahezu täglich Panzer und Bulldozer in palästinensische Flüchtlingslager, um Häuser, Straßen und landwirtschaftliche Flächen zu zerstören (vgl. Erubin 75a). Außergerichtliche Exekutionen (sprich: die Ermordung vgl. Kidduschin 40b) von Palästinensern sind ebenso an der Tagesordnung wie die permanente Bedrohung und Demütigung der palästinensischen Bevölkerung durch das israelische Militär (vgl. Baba mezia 114b). UN-Sonderberichterstatter John Dugard nennt Israel ein Apartheidregime, das schlimmer sei als das seinerzeit international boykottierte Südafrika.

Beschneidung:
Die genitale Verstümmelung männlicher Neugeborener ist sowohl aus medizinischer als auch aus hygienischer Sicht völlig unnötig. Dennoch lassen so gut wie alle Juden ihre Söhne am achten Tag nach der Geburt im Rahmen einer religiösen Zeremonie beschneiden. Mit anderen Worten: Schutzlosen Neugeborenen wird ohne triftigen Grund das wohl empfindlichste Stückchen Haut weggeschnitten. In den USA werden übrigens alle Jungen sofort nach der Geburt beschnitten - meist ohne ausdrückliche Zustimmung der Eltern. Diese unerhörte Praxis in amerikanischen Kreißsälen geht auf die Initiative des jüdischen Arztes Abraham Wolbarst aus dem Jahre 1914 zurück. Erst allmählich beginnen sich amerikanische Eltern gegen die routinemäßige genitale Verstümmelung ihrer Jungen zu wehren. (google Suchworte: "male circumcision" oder PBS Dokumentarfilm: "Whose Body, Whose Rights?")

Die Kosher Nostra:
Jeder hat schon mal den Begriff "koscher" gehört und weiß in etwa, was damit gemeint ist. Doch kaum jemand kennt die Kosher Nostra. Dies ist ein weltweit tätiges Syndikat, das Lebensmittelkonzernen für teures Geld völlig sinnlose Koscher-Zertifizierungen aufnötigt. Firmen, die nicht mitmachen, werden unterschwellig mit Boykott oder negativer Presse bedroht. Mittlerweile ist in den USA ist gut wie jeder in Supermärkten erhältliche Artikel "koscher" zertifiziert, ganz egal, ob es sich um Limonade, Kekse, Waschmittel oder Plastiktüten handelt. Dies ist im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes ein Milliardenschwindel (siehe auch: www.aztlan.net/koshernostra.htm sowiehttp://www.ukar.org/tax02.html).

Auch in Europa zahlen Verbraucher, ohne es überhaupt zu ahnen, eine religiös motivierte Koscher-Steuer an Juden. Beispiele bekannter Firmen, deren Produkte als koscher zertifiziert sind: Coca Cola, Nestlé, Kellogg´s, Del Monte, Hilcona, Thomy, Dr. Oetker, Henkel, Underberg, Milford, Milupa, Beck´s Bier, Ulzena, Degussa, BASF, Bayer AG (letztere drei für chemische Lebensmittelzusätze).

Im Sinne der von Konzernen und Politikern so oft gepriesenen Transparenz für Verbraucher sollte jeder Käufer von koscher zertifizierten Produkten (90-seitiges Verzeichnis siehe u.a. hier: www.icz.org/downloads/koscherliste_0412.pdf) die Hersteller fragen, welchen praktischen Nutzen eine solche Zertifizierung für den überwiegenden Anteil (in der BRD ca. 99,8%) der nichtjüdischen Verbraucher hat, wie hoch diese religiöse Steuer ist, wer das Geld kassiert und wofür es eingesetzt wird.

Schächten:
Fleisch ist nur "koscher", wenn das Schlachttier auf religiös-rituelle Weise getötet wird. Hierbei werden dem unbetäubten Tier gleichzeitig Luftröhre, Speiseröhre und Halsschlagader durchtrennt. Der Todeskampf dauert meist über zehn Minuten. Diese völlig unnötige Grausamkeit gegenüber Tieren ist in Deutschland gesetzlich untersagt. Juden haben mit der etwas weit hergeholten Behauptung, das Schächten sei durch die Religionsfreiheit geschützt, eine Ausnahmeregelung erstritten, die es ihnen gestattet, diese bestialische Tierquälerei fortzuführen.

Eruv:
Jede größere Stadt in der Juden leben, hat einen Eruv. Dies ist ein durch eine symbolische Schnur eingegrenztes Gebiet, in welchem es frommen Juden gestattet ist, auch am Sabbat (Samstag) leichte Arbeiten zu verrichten, wie z.B. einen Schlüssel tragen, Licht einschalten oder einen Fahrstuhlknopf betätigen. Man mag dies für einen längst überkommenen religiösen Hokus-Pokus halten, aber die in London ansässigen Juden haben erst kürzlich gegen den Widerstand der nichtjüdischen Bevölkerung einen neuen Eruv ausgewiesen. Sowohl das Europäische Parlament in Straßburg als auch das Weiße Haus in Washington befinden sich (rein zufällig?) in einem als Eruv gekennzeichneten Gebiet.

Auf´s Kreuz spucken:
Für fromme Juden ist das Bespucken von Nichtjuden und deren religiösen Symbolen eine gottgefällige Tat. In Israel hat der Haß auf das christliche Kreuz geradezu paranoide Züge angenommen: In vielen Schulbüchern wurde dort sogar das international gebräuchliche arithmetische Zeichen für Addition "+" durch ein auf den Kopf gestelltes "T" ersetzt (Israel Shahak, "Spitting on the Cross").

Kol Nidre:
Am höchsten jüdischen Feiertag (Jom Kippur) wird das Gebet "Kol Nidre" gesungen. Damit erklären Juden alle Gelöbnisse, die sie im kommenden Jahr ablegen werden, im voraus für null und nichtig (vgl. Nedarim 23b).

Eine wichtige Schlußbemerkung:
Das Ziel dieser Streitschrift ist keineswegs, Menschen zu diffamieren, nur weil diese zufällig als Juden geboren wurden. Das Anliegen ist vielmehr eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit der judaistischen Ideologie, die, wie Voltaire bereits anmerkte, im direkten Gegensatz zu den allgemein akzeptierten Vorstellungen von Moral, Ethik und Anstand steht.

Bitte hier klicken, um diesen diesen Text als Faltblatt (PDF-Datei) abzurufen.

+ + ausdrucken + + beidseitig kopieren + + weitergeben + +

(Für optimale Druckqualität des Faltblattes werden für Adobe folgende Druckeinstellungen empfohlen: automatisch drehen und zentrieren, keine Seitenanpassung bzw. Skalierung, nicht automatisch vergrößern oder verkleinern)

Ein Leben für Freiheit Eine Selbstbiographie Deutsche Übersetzung: Jürgen Graf Ein spannendes Lebensschicksal ! Nicht viele Menschen unserer Zeit dürften ein so ereignisreiches Leben hinter sich haben wie der nunmehr in Schweden ansässige Marokkaner Ahmed Rami, der Sohn eines berberischen Stammeshäuptlings und später ausgebildeter Offizier in der marokkanischen Armee. Zusammen mit anderen Gegnern des korrupten Regimes ihres Landes hat er sich der junge Panzeroffizier Anfang der siebziger Jahre zweimal an kühnen Staatsstreichen beteiligt, um den diktatorischen und depravierten König abzusetzen, beidemal ohne Glück. Bei der letzteren Gelegenheit schwebte er in grösster Lebensgefahr, bis es ihm schliesslich gelang, sich als Flüchtling in Sicherheit zu bringen. Ahmed gehört zu den wenigen intelligenten, mutigen Menschen, die bereit sind, alles für die Ideale der Freiheit und Gerechtigkeit zu geben. Seine Lebensgeschichte ist nicht nur ungewöhnlich spannend, sondern auch sehr aufschlussreich in bezug auf die drängenden geistigen und sozialen Probleme unserer Zeit! Gib mir Gleichmut, die Dinge zu akzeptieren, die ich nicht ändern kann! Gib mir Mut, die Dinge zu ändern, die ich ändern kann! Gib mir Weisheit, das eine vom anderen zu unterscheiden!

_______________________

Anti-Semitism:

A modern form of blasphemy
, or the inevitable result of Jewish behavior?

In this day and age everyone of the Jews or the policy of the State of Israel is criticized, almost reflexively assumed that he was an anti-Semite. At the same self-appointed moral authorities want the likes of Michel Friedman looking to make the public, anti-Semitism was a totally irrational and inexplicable phenomenon. The Jews have always been met with claimed the only reason for rejection, because they were just Jews.

Could be the obvious question of whether anti-Semitism may also be attributed to the behavior of the Jews themselves, is of the opinion guardians of "political correctness" rejected, as it were a modern form of blasphemy. But the Zionist Bernard Lazare was in his 1894 book "Anti-Semitism, its history and its causes" of this question and came up closer to realization:

"If there had been an aversion to Jews only in one country or only to a certain time, it would be easy to fathom the reason for this. But the Jews have always been the target of hatred of all peoples have been, wherever they are in significant number settled. Jews came from many different peoples with different mores and customs, in widely separated areas in denial. Therefore, the reasons for anti-Semitism still existed among the Jews themselves have, and not with those which they reject are facing. "

So if you want to find out the real causes of anti-Semitism can not help but to look into more detail on the spiritual homeland of the Jews. In http://www.judentum.org/we learn here about the following:

"The heart of the Jewish character and the essence of the Jewish people lies in a hidden factory, known as the Talmud. The Talmud is the core of Judaism. Understanding of the Talmud's understanding of Judaism ..."

What could be more than the Talmud should be consulted to discover the secret of the Jewish character? But even a cursory glance at the sacred book of the Jews can guess why Martin Luther called the Talmud already a "book full of idolatry, blasphemy and a curse." There follow a few quotes from the Talmud, in brackets is the respective treaty specified.

"The possessions of the goyim are like the desert, they are abandoned property and anyone who first takes possession of them, they acquire." (Baba bathra 54b)

"The Jews are allowed to non-Jews to leave, to deceive them and to drive with him trading to deceive him and take his money. Because the assets of the non-Jews should be regarded as common property and it belongs to the first [Jews], who can secure. " (Baba Kamma 113a)

"If a non-Jew is concerned with the Torah, then he deserves to die." (Synhedrin 59a)

"The house of a Gentile is not considered a dwelling." (Erubin 75a)

"The best of the Goyim should kill you." (Kiduschin 40b)

"Why are the non-Jews are dirty because they have not stood on Mount Sinai as that is present at the queue of Chava, she instilled in her a dirt;?. In Jisraéliten who stood at Mount Sinai, they lost all the dirt in the non-Jews But he did not lose himself. " (Aboda Zara 22b)

"When the Messiah comes, all the [Gentile] slave of Jisraéliten." (Erubin 43b)

"Anyone who sees the hosts of Goyim, speak: your mother is ashamed of the shame you gave birth." (Berakhoth 58a)

"Those who see the graves of the goyim, speak: your mother is ashamed of the shame you gave birth." (Berakhoth, 58b)

"Rather than give a free Jisraéliten usury on a Gentile." (Baba Metsia 71a)

"But you are my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are men her, she is human, but not hot, the secular people [ie the non-Jewish] people, but cattle." (Baba Metsia 114b)

"The seeds of non-Jews cattle semen." (Yebamoth 94b)

"The intercourse of the Gentiles is like intercourse of beasts." (Aboda Zara 22b)

"A girl three years and one day is suitable for sexual intercourse." (Yebamoth 57b, 60a Yebamoth, Aboda Zara 37a)

"The Notzüchter need to pay any damages because the girl would have had this pain later on her husband." (Baba Kamma 59a)

" If someone wishes that his vows the year were invalid, he spoke at the beginning of the year: every vow that I will do is null and void, he need only remember the vow. " (Nedarim 23b)

Most people respond to these Talmudic quotations with a mixture of non-belief-desire and horror. Following are the most common retorts to be answered:

1) These quotes are fake!
Answer:For centuries, Jewish religious scholars were trying to divert this threadbare defense of the racist and inciting statements of the Talmud. But ever since one of their number has translated the Talmud into German, anyone can read the above quoted passages here: the Babylonian Talmud. First complete and uncensored free translation into German of Lazarus Goldschmidt, Jewish Verlag Frankfurt (ISBN 3-633-54200-0). An English translation of the Talmud is available online at: www.come-and-hear.com/talmud

2) These quotes are taken out of context!
Answer: In what context please beautiful the statements quoted here would be compatible with modern notions of ethics, morality and decency? Anyone who criticizes it would only quoted a few passages from a 10,000-page work, let him take the trouble to study the original more closely. Thus, alone in the treatise "Aboda zara" over 500 times made ​​to non-Jews respect, and in no case are friendly formulations. In the rest of the Talmud finds no single place where Jews are called to ethical or even merciful behavior towards non-Jews. This is not surprising, because according to the Talmudic interpretation of the Torah (five books of Moses = the Old Testament) are the Ten Commandments for Jews only among themselves but not to the behavior of non-Jewish Jews.

3) This collection of quotations is anti-Semitic!
Answer: This is a prime example of how to deal with inflationary and thoughtless accusations of anti-Semitism. It's hardly possible that the Talmud, the sacred book of the Jews, "anti-Semitic" statements contains. Is it not rather the case that Judaism is marked by hatred and intolerance towards non-Jews? Against this background, the attitude of every non-Jew who sees through the Talmudic ideology has, by definition anti-Semitic.

4) Yes, but the Bible is no better!
Answer: This objection is fully justified, provided that the Old Testament is intended, in the Talmud is nothing more than a rabbinic interpretation of the Torah. This is reported in many parts of it, that the Israelites cut off other peoples ("utterly destroyed them") to match their angry, punishing God to bring Yahweh a sacrifice (see for example: 4.Mos 21.3, 5.Mos 3.6; 13:16; Jos 6.21, 8.26, 11.11 to 21; Ri 1.17; 21.11, 2 Sam 12:31; 1 Chron 4.41, Isaiah 34.2 -5 Jer 25.9; 50.21, 50.26).

By contrast, in the New Testament proclaimed the doctrine of love, mercy and forgiveness is a diametrical shift away from the proverbial Old Testament hatred and ideas of chosenness of the Hebrews. Nothing makes the contrast between the Old Testament and the New Testament clearly than the words of Jesus Christ to the Jews:

"You have your father the devil, and after lusts of your father ye will do He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth.. Because there is no truth in him when he speaks a lie, he speaketh of his own for he is a liar and the father of lies. " (Jn 8:44)

5) Just because we can of our past, the German Jews did not criticize!
Answer: Even if the official story of the Holocaust should be true, and because there are serious doubts (see: www.radioislam.net / mh.pdf ), gives the anyone the right to refer in response to legitimate criticism of a bygone chapter of history.

6) The thousand-year-old statements of the Talmud for Jews of today play no role whatsoever!
Answer: The counter is that rabbis emphasize today the central importance of the Talmud in Judaism at every available opportunity to see the already Quote from www.judentum.org mentioned. Also, the following statements from recently lead to the conclusion that the Talmudic ideology today is still the spiritual home of the Jews:

"The souls of Goyim [Gentiles] are quite different, inferior kind All Jews are good by nature, all the goyim of natural evil. The Jews are the crown of creation, the Goyim their scum." (Rabbi Shneur Zalman, one of the most influential Talmudic scholars of our time, FAZ, 11 3rd, 1994)

"Arabs are animals, not humans. Their flesh is the flesh of asses, so they should be treated like animals." (Sharon Kalimi, SZ, 3rd 3rd 1999)

[To kill 29 non-Jews] "In the Land of Israel has no Arabs the right to exist. Clearly, Arabs are on the cultural leader of the world far below. Goldstein's act is the fulfillment of some commandments of Jewish law dar. This includes revenge on Gentiles to practice. " (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ha'aretz, 5 11th 2003)

"If a Jew needs a liver, the Torah permits likely refer to a just passing by non-Jews, the liver violent Jewish life is infinitely more holy and unique as a non-Jewish.." (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, cited in Israel Shahak, "Jewish Fundamentalism" )

"The Palestinians are two-legged beasts" (Menahem Begin, former Israeli Prime Minister, New Statesman, 25 6th, 1982)

"We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it" (Ariel Sharon, Israeli prime minister on the radio station Kol Yisrael, 3rd 10th 2001)

"We will destroy the Palestinians as the locusts, and their heads against the wall to bang" (Nobel Peace Prize (!) Yitzhak Rabin, former Israeli Prime Minister, New York Times, 04/01/1988)

"The Jewish doctrine is racist, and that's good." (Rehavam Zeevi, former Israeli Minister of Tourism, SZ, 27th 10th, 2001). The same in the Israeli Army Radio:'' We should remove the Palestinians the same way as you get rid of lice. "

"Why the Jews are in business around the world incredibly successful, but in Israel? In Israel there is not enough goyim, is saying fool, waiting to be deceived. If all standing around the ball, can not score a goal . " (Chaim Bermant, an Israeli writer)

These are some quotes from influential Jews in recent times. Also, the following behaviors seem to be more influenced by the Talmudic spirit than by generally accepted ideas of ethics, tolerance and humanism:

Terrorist and apartheid regime of Israel:
Those who call themselves Jews, (being mostly descendants of Central Asian nation of the Khazars) of the brutal expulsion of the Palestinians to justify from their ancestral homeland to the hypocritical argument that their God Yahweh was the "Holy Land" exclusively to them given. In the State of Israel (in German: "God warrior") is called, are forbidden by all manner of the Nuremberg racial laws of 1935, marriages between Jews and Gentiles. Israel sends tanks and bulldozers almost daily in Palestinian refugee camps to destroy houses, roads and agricultural land (see Erubin 75a). Extrajudicial executions (read: the murder see Kiddushin 40b) of Palestinians are just as common as the permanent threat and humiliation of Palestinians by the Israeli military (see Baba Metsia 114b). UN Special Rapporteur John Dugard called Israel an apartheid regime that is worse than the time of its international boycott of South Africa.

Circumcision:
The genital mutilation of male newborns is both medically and from a hygienic point of view totally unnecessary. However, leave it cut almost all the Jews of their sons on the eighth day after birth as part of a religious ceremony. In other words, defenseless newborn is cut away for no good reason, probably the most sensitive piece of skin.In the U.S. all the way boys are circumcised immediately after birth - usually without the express consent of their parents. This outrageous practice in American delivery rooms is due to the initiative of the Jewish physician Abraham Wolbarst from 1914. Gradually, American parents start against the routine genital mutilation of their boys to fight back. (google search terms: "female circumcision" or PBS documentary, " Whose Body, Whose Rights? " )

The Kosher Nostra:
Everyone has the word "kosher" is and know roughly what is meant. But hardly anyone knows the Kosher Nostra. This is a global syndicate, the food companies for a lot of money totally useless kosher certifications imposes. Companies that do not participate are subliminally threatened with boycotts or negative press. Meanwhile in the U.S. is almost always available in supermarkets article "Kosher" certification, no matter whether it is soda, cookies, detergent or plastic bags. This is literally a billion dollar swindle (see also: www.aztlan.net / koshernostra.htm and http://www.ukar.org/tax02.html ).

In Europe, consumers pay, without knowing it at all, a religiously motivated tax on kosher Jews. Examples of well known companies whose products are certified as kosher: Coca Cola, Nestle, Kellogg's, Del Monte, Hilcona, Thomy, Dr. Oetker, Henkel, Underberg, Milford, Milupa, Beck's beer, Ulzena, Degussa, BASF, Bayer AG (the latter three for chemical food additives).

For the purposes of the corporations and politicians of the so often touted transparency for consumers should any buyer of kosher certified products (see, 90-page directory here: www.icz.org/downloads/koscherliste_0412.pdf ) ask the manufacturer, the practical benefits of such certification for the major share (about 99.8% in the FRG), the non-Jewish consumers, how high is this religious tax, who collects the money and what it is used.

Shafts:
Meat is only "kosher" if the animal is killed in battle religious-ritual way. Here the animals are simultaneously unbetäubten severed trachea, esophagus and jugular vein.The agony usually lasts about ten minutes. This completely unnecessary cruelty to animals is prohibited by law in Germany. Jews have with the somewhat far-fetched assertion that the wells would be protected by religious freedom, fought for an exemption that allows them to continue this bestial cruelty to animals.

Eruv:
Every major city where Jews live, has an eruv. This is a bounded by a symbolic string field in which it is pious Jews allowed to perform on the Sabbath (Saturday) light work, such as carrying a key, light switch or pressing an elevator button. It may be that this is a long traditional religious hocus-pocus hold, but the London-based Jews have recently reported the opposition of the non-Jewish population, a new eruv. Both the European Parliament in Strasbourg and the White House in Washington are (randomly?) In an area designated as an eruv.

Let's cross to spit:
for spitting on the pious Jews of non-Jews and their religious symbols is a godly act. In Israel, the hatred taken to the Christian cross really paranoid: In many textbooks, there is even the internationally common arithmetic sign of addition "+" with an upside-down "T" is replaced (Israel Shahak, "Spitting on the Cross" ).

Kol Nidre:
The highest Jewish holiday (Yom Kippur) is sung prayer "Kol Nidre". In order to explain all the Jews vows that she will drop next year, in advance, to be null and void (cf. Nedarim 23b).

An important final note:
The purpose of this pamphlet is not to defame people just because they happened to be born as Jews. The concern is rather a critical examination of the Judaic ideology, which, as Voltaire remarked already, in direct contrast to the generally accepted notions of morality, ethics and decency is.

Please click here to download this text as this leaflet (PDF file) retrieve.

Print + + + + + + copy both sides pass + +

(For optimum print quality of the leaflet are recommended for Adobe following print settings: center rotating automatically, no scaling or fit to page, do not automatically reduce or enlarge)

A life for Freedom An autobiography German translation: Jürgen Graf An exciting life drama! Not many people our age should have such an eventful life behind him as of now based in Sweden and Moroccan Ahmed Rami, the son of a Berber tribal chief and later trained officer in the Moroccan army. Along with other opponents of the corrupt regime of their country, he has a young tank officer in the early seventies, two involved in daring coups to oust the dictatorial and depraved King, both times with no luck. In the latter occasion he was seen in the greatest danger to life, until he finally managed to bring a fugitive to safety. Ahmed is one of the few intelligent, courageous people who are willing to give everything for the ideals of freedom and justice. His life story is not only unusually exciting but also very revealing in regard to the urgent intellectual and social problems of our time! Give me serenity to accept the things I can not change! Give me courage to change the things I can change! Give me wisdom to distinguish one from the other!

"The Auschwitz Gas Chamber Illusion" The Only Intentional Mass Extermination Programme In The Concentration Camps Of WW2 Was.... | Love for Life

"The Auschwitz Gas Chamber Illusion" The Only Intentional Mass Extermination Programme In The Concentration Camps Of WW2 Was.... | Love for Life

"The Auschwitz Gas Chamber Illusion" The Only Intentional Mass Extermination Programme In The Concentration Camps Of WW2 Was....

Mon, 09/08/2008 - 22:25 — Arthur Cristian

"The Auschwitz Gas Chamber Illusion" - "The Only Intentional Mass Extermination Programme In The Concentration Camps Of WW2 Was Targeted At Germans"

The Auschwitz 'Gas Chamber' Illusion by Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD Revised 24th May 2008 New Revisionist Voices

College Rejects Shoah Denier
By Daniella Peled
25th May 2008

A university has withdrawn a researcher’s fellowship after he published an article claiming that the gas chambers of Auschwitz never existed.

Dr Kollerstrom

The UCL (University Col-lege London) has withdrawn Dr. Kollerstrom's fellowship because he published the truth about Auschwitz in a scientific article for Codoh. The Holocaust Heresy Persecution is a standing mockery of justice - perhaps one of the most iniquitous that the arbitrary of man has ever devised ... A system which might well seem the invention of demons. The Holocaust-Heresy-Persecution is invented primarily to force public acceptance of a demonic creed the public does not want..

Nicholas Kollerstrom, an academic specialising in astronomy, posted the article, The Auschwitz "Gas Chamber" Illusion, on the website of the revisionist Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.

He claimed that only one million Jews died in the war and that "the only intentional mass extermination program[me] in the concentration camps of WW2 was targeted at Germans".

Dr Kollerstrom, 61, an honorary research fellow at University College London until Tuesday, stood by the claims this week, but expressed surprise that they had caused offence.

And he insisted the university "had not actually told me what’s so terrible about the article".

He complained that he had been accused of "thought-crime" after spending months researching it.

And he added: "If a smaller number were gassed, then surely the Jewish community should be pleased that it wasn’t so ghastly."

He wrote: "Let us hope the schoolchildren visitors are properly taught about the elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz, built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and Sunday afternoons while watching the water-polo matches; and shown the paintings from its art class, which still exist; and told about the camp library which had some 45,000 volumes for inmates to choose from, plus a range of periodicals; and the six camp orchestras at Auschwitz/Birkenau, its theatrical performances, including a children’s opera, the weekly camp cinema, and even the special brothel established there."

Dr Kollerstrom, of St John’s Wood, North West London, said he prefers to call himself a revisionist rather than a denier. Revisionists, he said, "want to look at European history without quite so much hate and bitterness".

He also claimed he was the victim of "a calumny" by bloggers who had accused him of far-right sympathies and posted on the internet an image doctored to show him in Nazi uniform.

"I have some very good Jewish friends and have never had the slightest interest in the Nazi movement," he said. "I never go to Germany. I have always belonged to things like the Green Party, CND and Respect."

A UCL spokesman said: "The views expressed by Dr Kollerstrom are diametrically opposed to the aims, objectives and ethos of UCL, such that we wish to have absolutely no association with them or with their originator.

"We, therefore, have no choice but to terminate Dr Kollerstrom’s research fellowship with immediate effect."

A source at the university also said that there had been concern at opinions Dr Kollerstrom had expressed regarding conspiracy theories over the July 7 2005 London bombings and the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. His areas of research include Newtonian theory and the 19th-century British discovery of Neptune. He is also the author of a yearly guide to Gardening and Planting by the Moon, which contains chapters on "Using the Star Zodiac" and "The Moon and Crop Yield".

Here is an extract from one of his postings on the CODOH website:

“Zyklon-B was used at Auschwitz, as an insecticide. It was vital in attempting to maintain hygiene that mattresses be deloused. Cyanide gas was absorbed on to clay-type granules, designed to make the deadly gas as ‘safe’ as it could be.

“If you go to Auschwitz today, you can’t see any authentic gas chambers. You see stone huts, and experts have testified that they could not have been used to gas people, owing to problems in sealing them up (Zyklon-B released its cyanide gas rather slowly).”

In another, he wrote:

“The verdicts of Nuremberg were made final and binding for the post-war FRG [Federal Republic of Germany]. Germany has since paid a hundred billion Deutschmarks to Israel by way of Holocaust-compensation — clearly, that needs to be refunded.

“Germany should take the advice of Iranian leader Ahmadinajad and stop paying it, because that funding provides undue motivation for holocaust ‘memories’. Germany is helping to maintain the holocaust legend, by thus aiding the state of Israel.”

Link to this article: http://globalfire.tv/nj/08en/history/kollerstrom.htm

------------------

Link to the complete article of Dr. Kollerstrom:

New Revisionist Voices

The Auschwitz 'Gas Chamber' Illusion
by Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD
Revised 05/24/08

This essay will argue that well-designed cyanide gas chambers were indeed present at Auschwitz, and did work efficiently, but that they were operated for purposes of hygiene and disinfection, in order to save lives and not take them. Terrible mass mortality came about in the German labour-camps, especially towards the end of the war, but maybe we have to try a bit harder to understand what caused this. Amongst all the archival material for the German Third Reich, there has always been a notable lack of documentation to support the existence of an intentional mass-extermination program - of Jews, or anyone else. We’ve all heard stories about a Nazi program of exterminating Jews, but to what extent are there documents or any physical remains showing this? Has the traditional Holocaust story developed merely out of rumours, misunderstandings, and wartime propaganda? From stories pre-dating the Second World War to the Nuremberg Trials which gave official sanction to the notion, to subsequent trials, books and films, we have had it imprinted on our collective psyche.

Europe needs, more than anything else, a truth and reconciliation forum to get to the bottom of these matters, and try to exorcise the demonic hate-images. Many European states have passed laws that prohibit citizens from expressing doubt - Germany, France, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Czech Republic, Romania, Belgium and Switzerland. Collectively, we need to work trough our despair, rage, and ideas of blame, to try and access the real historical record.

Cyanide at Auschwitz

Zyklon-B was used at Auschwitz, as an insecticide. It was vital in attempting to maintain hygiene that mattresses be deloused. Liquid hydrogen cyanide was adsorbed onto clay-type granules, designed to make the deadly gas as ‘safe’ as it could be. If you go to Auschwitz today, you can’t see any authentic gas chambers. You see stone huts, and experts have testified that they could not have been used to gas people, owing to problems in sealing them up (Zyklon-B released its cyanide gas rather slowly[1]).

In 1988 the scientific team of Fred Leuchter (a US execution-expert ‘Mr Death’ in gas-chamber technology) visited Poland, and concluded that the Auschwitz ‘gas chambers’ could not possibly have functioned in the alleged manner - i.e., they were not gas chambers[2]. In the following years, others would confirm the accuracy of his seminal, ‘Leuchter Report’. The German chemist Germar Rudolf, who worked at the Max Plank institute for Solid State Physics, is now in jail, because he likewise measured the high levels of the cyanide in the walls of the de-lousing chambers. It happens that this gas bonds permanently with iron, and iron is present in all the cement etc of stone walls. Whereas, he found none in the walls of what were supposed to be the ‘gas chambers’ which were mainly shower units. He thereby confirmed the work of Leuchter who likewise only found remains of the cyanide gas-insecticide in the de-lousing chambers.[3]

After Rudolf’s report was published in 1993, he lost his job and was prevented from completing his doctorate, then a few years later he was given a jail sentence. He is now in a high-security prison near Stuttgart, for the crime of not finding cyanide in the ‘gas chambers[4],’ echoing Leuchter’s cyanide residue investigations. [5] When a chemist is put in jail, for replicating the result of another - in Germany of all places, the nation which invented chemical procedure – then the farce cannot continue for much longer[6] (The gas chambers were conveniently located east of Germany behind the Iron Curtain to make them inaccessible to westerners, which helped the myth to flourish).

The Leuchter results were almost too good to be true, with a three orders of magnitude difference between the cyanide levels in the delousing chamber walls (about one part per thousand) and those in the washing chambers (aka ‘gas chambers’), around one part per million. They are not published in any peer-reviewed chemistry journal, for obvious reasons. The only way to hold a debate on this subject appears to be in a courtroom, while being prosecuted! It is hard to reach the calm condition necessary for replication of chemical measurements. Nonetheless people have replicated the fundamental result[7], and even folk with no interest in chemistry can appreciate the pretty blue colour on the outside of the de-lousing chamber (where the ferrocyanide has seeped right through the wall) and its complete absence around the so-called ‘gas chambers.’ Let’s face it, the case is established: the cyanide poison was used where the German records state that it was used – for delousing mattresses, clothing etc - whereas it was not used where the US and UK (at Nuremberg) alleged.

Tourists, thirty million of them, have filed through ‘Krema 1’ at Auschwitz, with its piteous piles of shoes, etc of the dead. This was reconstructed after the war in 1946[8], a fact revealed 1992 by Dr. Franciszek Piper, the Senior Curator and Director of Archives of the Auschwitz State Museum. The historic remains from the camp are such things as shower-unit huts, a swimming pool and a morgue. There was a camp orchestra, and quite a collection of pictures from the camp art-classes,[9] although these cannot be shown in Germany or Poland, on account of laws prohibiting the doubting of the Holocaust. Anne Frank of ‘Diary’ fame came to the camp in 1944 with her father who was ill. He was put into the hospital there, and recovered, suggesting that he was decently looked after.[10]

The ‘gas chambers’ at Auschwitz had water pipes in their ceilings, indicating that they were designed as shower units. They generally lacked tight-seal doors, which would have been essential, even though these were easy to install – the Leuchter report cited the absence of such seals as one reason why the alleged ‘gas chambers’ would never have functioned.

The Final Solution – An Export Program

The ‘Final Solution’ of Adolf Hitler retained a single meaning right through WW2, central to the program of ‘National socialism,’ and signified the deportation of Jews, generally eastwards to Poland and Russia[11]. This program did not change at any point, e.g. the Wannsee conference of 1942,[12] to signify deliberate extermination. If that practice ever happened, it was not a centrally-directed policy and did not involve gas chambers: many tons of documentation of ‘third Reich’ policies remains, and no-one has been able to find therein any hint of such a meaning – of intentional genocide. The historical record fails to show any central decision to exterminate Jews by Nazi Germany.

The Gestapo and Zionists were collaborating in the late 30s because they had in this respect similar aims.[13] But, a German Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937 stated that: ‘In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world’.[14] International Jewish organisations twice declared war on Germany, in 1933 then again in 1939[15]. As the ‘final solution’ policy[16] was thwarted by the Allies, the camps became places of hard labour; then under the impact of Allied terror-bombing ravages of disease and famine took place.

No Documents?

At the Auschwitz trial held at Frankfurt in the mid-sixties, the court had to conclude that it lacked ‘almost all the means or evidence available in a normal murder trial’ including ‘the bodies of the victim, autopsy reports, expert reports on the cause of death, evidence as to the criminals, murder weapons, etc[17].’ Far from leading to doubt, this gave to the mythic gas chambers a metaphysical status, doubt of which was forbidden. 'No documents have survived, perhaps none ever existed,' concluded the Holocaust historian Léon Poliakov.[18]

‘In the case of the rush to impute to the Nazis a programme for the extermination of millions of people which has implausibly left no material traces, all the normal rules of historiography seem not only to have been suspended, but to have been violated over and over again. Historians routinely cite documents from secondary works like Raul Hilberg's The Destruction of the European Jews (1961) or from printed collections of documents, such as Robert Wolfe's Holocaust: The Documentary Evidence - but they never cite original documents.[19]

The nearest we have to primary-source documents concerning what went on within the camps, comes from the bulky, three-volume International Red Cross Report published in 1948. This and especially Volume III describes the couple of thousand regular, routine inspection-visits that its doctors made through the war years to the Polish labour-camps. Their report never hints at any gas-chamber, nor any mass-cremations. While maintaining a politically neutral position[20], it confirms that mortality in the camps was to a large extent caused by the allied terror-bombing.[21] Likewise Winston Churchill’s bulky, six-volume account of the War gives no allusion to the subject, especially volume Six, Triumph and Tragedy where one would expect to have some allusion if he believed it had happened.[22]

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It sharply criticised the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps." Furthermore, it ordered: “The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp commandants ... The camp doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as possible.” The directive stressed that "the Reichsfuhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced."[23] A further letter to all concentration camp commanders dated 20th January, 1943, reaffirmed that ‘every means must be used to lower the death rate.’ By September 1943 Auschwitz still had mortality peaking at 80/day, viewed as ‘catastrophic’ by the SS administration. Thus, from authentic documents concerning the need to reduce fatalities at the Auschwitz camp, the world has moved to a belief in genocide, with not a single authentic, supporting document[24]. The Auschwitz camp was set up as an industrial plant using the giant coalfields of Poland, and located at the confluence of rivers; it was essential to the war-effort - it would have made no sense to start exterminating its inmates.

The Hamburg judge Wilhelm Staeglich had been positioned near Auschwitz during the war and had on various occasions dropped into the camps around there. The conditions seemed fairly tolerable, he recalled, and certainly nothing resembling an extermination program existed. In particular, he had discerned no fear of mistreatment amongst the inmates. He published a testimony to this effect in 1973, and in return for his shocking news a German inquisition forced him to resign his job, stripped him of his doctoral degree, and banned his book. He was then subjected to police raids. His book, translated into English, is an essential text.[25]

German military radio messages were successfully decrypted at Bletchley Park using the ‘enigma’ codebreaker. Concerning the labour camps, over the period Spring 1942-February ’43, the following information was obtained: ‘The return from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.’[26] That seems clear enough - though no-one took any notice of it at Nuremberg.

Bodies were disposed of by individual cremation, and the records for coke fuel consumption over the period February 1942 – October 1943 for the cremation ovens indicate that around five thousand bodies were then burnt. That accords with the number of registered, deceased inmates, viz those who had died from natural causes[27], who had to be cremated rather than buried because of the great typhoid epidemics. This suggests that no mass-incineration of bodies took place. Josef Kramer, a supervisor at the Auschwitz camp, gave a statement after the war which is recommended by Professor Butz as probably genuine: it had 350-500 deaths per week happening over May-November 1944, all from natural causes, a very high figure because sick prisoners were sent there, and the dead were all cremated. He believed the camp held up to 100,000 prisoners, mainly Poles and Prussians.[28]

No Photos?

Not only is there no trace of ‘Third Reich’ documentation[29] for what is alleged, but no photographs exist showing anything resembling such a group-gassing procedure. Do you believe that Jews both male and female stripped then marched into the gas chambers, then were hauled out in piles? If so, are you willing to believe that neither the very-thorough Germans nor the clever Jews wanted or were able to get a single picture of this ultimate horror? Go to Google and search – you’ll find rows of emaciated bodies, dead of typhus, will that do? I don’t think so.

US air-photographs taken in 1944 (released in 1978) when the ‘program’ was supposed to be in full swing do not show any huge crematoria burning corpses nor queues entering the ‘gas chambers: ‘The few air photos of Auschwitz-Birkenau known to date from the period of December 1943 to February 1945 show no signs of fuel depots, smoke from chimneys or open fires, burning pits or pyres. The photos were altered: Zyklon B input hatches, groups of inmates, and walls around crematoria were retouched onto the photo negatives … To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at any location in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two….That the photos in western hands were altered in order to incriminate Germany, and were first published by the CIA, is also very significant indeed.’[30]

The Fabrication of Untruth

Let’s hear a couple of testimonies concerning the dreaded gas-chambers. An Austrian woman, Maria Van Herwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988, as she had been interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz. Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads. Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed, and she witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program.[31] A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing stories only later.[32]

The Allied carpet-bombing destroyed the supply lines for the Camps, and so the death-toll mounted from famine and disease. Leaflets were dropped from the air, alleging that at Auschwitz a ‘final solution’/extermination of Jews policy was being conducted, using gas. [33] That was the genesis of the story, as those Allied-propaganda leaflets were believed. Greeted by the sight, of rows of famished Jews who had died of e.g. typhoid, it was not hard to see its confirmation. ‘Far from it being common knowledge in Germany that people were being gassed … the vast majority of Germans were horrified by the United Nations accusations and they protested that they had never heard of such acts until after the cessation of hostilities when they had begun listening to United Nations broadcasts …. Since the British Broadcasting Corporation had been broadcasting these accusations regularly for many months before the end of the war, those Germans who had "common knowledge" of the gassing before the war's end most likely got this "knowledge" from the BBC!’[34] The gas-chamber legend was born in December 1941, when the German author Thomas Mann declared on the BBC that, in German hospitals, the severely wounded, the old and the feeble were culled with poison gas. This was the ‘first appearance of gas chambers in propaganda.’[35]

As to how the stories got going, here is a remark by Faurisson: ‘The Foreign Office saw the new rumors of the Second World War only as Jewish inventions, and many in American circles shared that conviction[36]. Edward Beneš, President of Czechoslovakia (in exile in London), announced in November 1942, after inquiry by his staff, that the Germans, contrary to what had been reported to him, were not exterminating the Jews. The American Jew, Felix Frankfurter, a Supreme Court judge, stated to Jan Karski on the subject: "I can't believe you." In August of 1943, Cordell Hull, Secretary of State, warned the U.S. ambassador in Moscow by telegram that in planning a joint Allied statement on "the German crimes in Poland", it would be advisable to eliminate any mention of the gas chambers, since, as the British pointed out, there was "insufficient evidence" in the matter[37]

The Hoax of Nuremberg

A modern inquiry needs to start from the data-fabrication at Nuremberg by the US/UK, using systematic assassination and torture of witnesses. The Nuremberg trials started in 1946 with the image of six million dead as firmly established.[38] This did not emerge as a conclusion from the trials, but in its immensity it was presented to the tortured and/or beaten[39] Nazis as a fact, and would they confess their part in it? All the main defendants at Nuremberg insisted that prior to the trial they had not known of any mass murder of Jews: except that Rudolf Höss, the former Commandant of Auschwitz, signed on March 15, 1946, a document averring that he had overseen the slaughter of two and a half million Jews, and this was read out on 15th April at Nurnberg. That day signified the birth of Auschwitz’s horror-myth. Two weeks earlier, Höss had remarked:

Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as well have said it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.”[40]

Decades later, an account was published of how Höss had been tortured for three days and nights without sleep by a British army team in order to extract that statement.[41] In a letter to his wife, Höss apologised for his ‘confessions’ and explains that they had been extracted from him under torture[42]. The victorious Allies could not have their ‘truth’ come out at Nuremberg, without the assistance of torture. In 2001, Patricia Meehan discussed the network of secret "Direct Interrogation Centres" the British had set up in their occupational zone of Germany[43] - torture chambers, to prepare ‘evidence’ for the upcoming trials. A Zionist influence was noted at the Nuremberg trials,[44] not least concerning the figure of six million.[45]

Weighty books are in print as memorials to ‘the Holocaust’, but, let’s hear a sceptical view from Down Under:

“…Yet in the case of the Holocaust, the dearth of material evidence for the existence of large-scale extermination programme is not perceived as significant. It is assumed that the Nazis destroyed their vast death machinery so thoroughly as to preclude all possibility of postwar detection. It is not permissible to express doubts as to whether the Nazis could really have eliminated all material evidence so completely, including making the ashes of six million people vanish from the locations at which they must have been interred. To think such doubts is to engage in thought crime….

‘The reality, therefore, is that the bulk of the 'evidence' for the Holocaust derives from a corpus of documents that was expressly manufactured by the OSS and OCC in 1945-46 for the purpose of incriminating the leaders of the former German government at Nuremberg. The procedure went roughly along these lines: the Documentation Division in Paris created 'copies' (in English only), certified them as true, and sent them to the prosecution in Nuremberg, while the original documents (if they ever existed) were never seen or heard of again. German translations of the original English texts were then prepared and sent to the defense in Nuremberg, where they arrived as late as possible so that the defense had insufficient time to worry about such matters as their authenticity….

‘Starting in May 1945 with the alleged suicides of SS-General Hans-Adolf Prützmann, SS head Heinrich Himmler and SS-General Odilo Globocnik while in British captivity, there followed a bizarre string of murders of individuals associated with the Auschwitz concentration camp. (These were perpetrated by a Jewish hit squad known as the DIN.) As Joseph Bellinger, author of a new book on Himmler's murder, points out, within six months or so of the war's end practically any one who could have shed light on the Jewish policy of the Third Reich was murdered!’ This, it must be said, was extremely convenient for the prosecution at Nuremberg.[46]

At Nuremberg, the German war-generals as well as being tortured had their wives arrested, to dissuade them from making inappropriate remarks in court. They were kept in solitary confinement to prevent their comparing notes, as each was presented with the Great Untruth and asked to believe it. Finally, most of them were hanged, by a court which felt free to invent new laws, and to act as prosecutor, judge, lawyer and executioner: American justice!

At Nuremberg, invoices for the delivery of Zyklon-B were presented as evidence for human ‘gassings.’[47] The normal, routine purpose and function of the Zyklon-B as an insecticide[48] was more or less completely omitted: the manufacture of the ten-cubic metre ‘gaskammer’ (gas chambers) by the firm DEGESCH, for which the Zyklon-B was designed in order to delouse clothes and bedding, as part of the great struggle against typhus, was overlooked. Throughout the German labour-camps these chambers - installed in 1942 when the scourge of typhus arrived - consumed tons of Zyklon-B, and they can still today be visited, in the camps of Majdanek and Auschwitz, their walls a deep turquoise-blue due to saturation with iron-cyanide. These chambers are a lot smaller than the ones which tourists are taken round as alleged-human gas chambers.

At Nuremberg, the ‘gas chamber’ illusion was perpetrated by conflating two different types of chamber. The little disinfection-rooms were properly designed with efficient fans, tight-fitting doors, heaters to make the Zyklon-B evaporate quickly, and ducts and tall chimneys to remove the deadly gas. The morgues were the opposite – long, cold and damp, built partly below ground to keep them cool, having only slow ventilation, no holes in the roof for you-know-what, and a large table down the middle for laying stiffs on, prior to their being taken to the cremation ovens next door. These morgues (or sometimes a washroom), were strangely re-imagined as human gas chambers, while the actual, real, working gas-chambers became forgotten. Such phantoms became alluded to as ‘Kremas,’ a vague term suitable for rooms that never existed.[49]

Coming of the Truthseekers

In the postwar years, anyone claiming to have a personal memory of the German gas-chambers would be liable to have Paul Rassinier turn up on their doorstep. Having himself experience the hell of the Buchenwald camp he was far from being a fan of the Nazis; but, neither was he prepared to endure fabricated stories on the subject. He spent years travelling about Europe with his tape-recorder and questions, but always he found that the witnesses came out with ‘evasions or palpable lies,’ and his published report concluded:

With regard to the gas chambers, the almost endless procession of false witnesses and of falsified documents to which I have drawn the reader’s attention during this long study, proves, nevertheless, one thing: never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order - or in fact order – the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner.[50]

That bold conclusion (for which he was, naturally, jailed) kick-started the ‘revisionist’ movement! We may here note that the money which the FRG keeps paying out to ‘holocaust survivors’ does enormous damage here, in stimulating ‘memories’ and generating such averred cases.

Robert Faurisson investigated the configuration of the alleged Auschwitz ‘gas chambers,’ then Zundel[51] got to hear of this. At a historic 1985 trial in Toronto, witnesses were grilled for the first time ever over the existence of the alleged ‘gas chambers,’ and it was found that no such testimony would stand up. On the fourth day of this trial, a marvellous climax was reached when Zundel’s lawyer Doug Christie put these questions to a top ‘Holocaust’ expert Dr Raul Hillberg, author of the multi-volume, multi-edition work, The Destruction of the European Jews:

Christie: Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?

Hilberg: I’m at a loss.

Christie: You are (at a loss) because you can’t. I want one report, before, during or after the war that shows that someone was killed by the use of those gases.

Hilberg: You want an autopsy (report) and I know of no autopsy.[52]

- he could not cite one scientific report! That surely remains the case today; as likewise he could provide no evidence for a single death as diagnosed due to cyanide poisoning, even though the symptoms of this are quite distinctive.

Faurisson was an advisor to Zundel in this trial, and a subsequent one, and this duo just kept on winning the arguments. The prosecution could come up with no credible witnesses for a gas-chamber’s existence:

“… in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'. Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any witnesses who could properly speak about them. All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them testified before the court as to having seen one or having participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas chambers'.

“Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented themselves as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz", showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that inevitably they retorted: "How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been gassed also."”[53] (Faurisson)

The study of history cannot exist without dissenting views, and who would want to read a history journal that did not allow this? One fails to understand why ‘revisionism’ should be reprehensible, and Jews especially should be relieved to discover that their ancestors were never subject to such a horror. Bestselling author David Irving, who has written over a dozen books on WWII, was recently jailed[54]. His definitive, 700- page blockbuster Hitler’s War gave no hint that the Fuhrer ever got to hear of a gas chamber, or gave any extermination command! Irving is known for the care with which he checks out his primary-source material. In 1991 his publisher, Macmillan, destroyed all their copies of his books. Irving has paid quite a price for the truth he discovered.

In November 1991 Fred Leuchter was about to speak at Chelsea Town Hall (invited by David Irving), when he was arrested onstage by the police at the request of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and deported back to the United States. So much for freedom of speech. When his trailblazing ‘Leuchter Report’ was first published in 1989, the House of Commons denounced it as ‘Nazi propaganda’ and a ‘fascist publication’ (on July 20th, with 100 MPs voting). Even the House of Commons, however, cannot alter the laws of chemistry: the durability of the ferrocyanide ion is now pivotal to the Holocaust debate!

We are not likely to get important insights unless the ‘thoughtcrime’ penalty is lifted from the German people, and they are allowed to review their own past. The definitive modern textbook, Dissecting the Holocaust has chapters by some twenty different authors over six hundred pages.[55] In 1995 the German Government demanded that all copies be confiscated and burnt![56] Edited by Germar Rudolf, it draws its inspiration from the pioneer labours of Ernst Zundel. While in Tennessee and publishing ‘revisionist’ material, he was seized by the police and thrown into solitary confinement in a Canadian jail[57]. After two years he was transferred to Germany, where his trial now progresses. He recently (October 2006) read to the court an open letter from the Iranian president to Germany’s chancellor - to the judge’s fury. The letter said, in effect, that Germany had been on its knees before Zion for fifty years and it was time to get up[58].

Forbidden Doubt and Fictional Horror

Doubt anything in our modern world, scoff at sacred texts, no-one will care - except that one kind of doubt is forbidden to you, which will land you in jail – in ten different nations! You can read the Hammer-horror account in, e.g., Auschwitz by Lawrence Rees (2005): every hour or so, a thousand naked Jews were marched (somehow) into a room with space for maybe one or two hundred, the doors are locked, then the Zyklon-B is poured down special chutes or holes in the ceiling (which did not exist in the war, they were added later), then after the screaming stops ‘powerful fans’ remove the poison gas. In your dreams, Mr Rees. There were no such powerful fans. But, then what? The mass of bodies will be mixed up with the Zyklon-B, and that is specifically designed to keep emitting the cyanide gas slowly. How is anyone supposed to shovel out this tortured mass of corpses mixed up with poison powder? Remember there are only ordinary-sized doors, mostly opening inwards. Its an unthinkable nightmare that could not possibly have worked, and would certainly have gassed any workers trying to operate it. It is the ‘safe’ design of this insecticide material, which would have prevented it from functioning in this deliriously-imagined manner.

No German government existed after the war, that was the ‘unconditional surrender’which the Allies demanded. By losing both its senior military staff and government, Germany was in effect decapitated - necessary for the illusory version of events to be perpetrated. The verdicts of Nuremberg were made final and binding for the postwar FRG. Germany has since paid a hundred billion Deutchmarks to Israel by way of Holocaust-compensation. Germany should take the advice of Iranian leader Ahmadinajad and stop paying it, because that funding provides undue motivation for holocaust ‘memories.’ Germany is helping to maintain the holocaust legend, by thus aiding the state of Israel.[59]

The United Nations has now established its annual Holocaust Remembrance Day on 27 January, as of 2006. On this anniversary, we all need to mull over the faking of history and the Greatest Lie Ever Told. As Perseus gazed at the Medusa only via a mirror, to avoid being petrified, to too we need calm reflection and the power of Truth to avoid our collective destruction.

Notes

[1] www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=5588

[2] Fred Leuchter, Auschwitz: the First Forensic Examination of Auschwitz: London, 1989; 1988, Toronto.www.zundelsite.org/english/basic_articles/inside.html For debate, see: www.codoh.com(info)/gcgv/gc426v12.html

[3] http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/

[4] www.takeourworldback.com/short/rudolfarrested.htm

[5]. http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/ www.dailynorthwestern.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/02/14/43f1778c0f7e0

[6] www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html

[7] www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/014_jam.html In 1990 the Krakow Forensic Institute obtained somewhat lower values: their brick samples from Auschwitz ‘gas chambers’ gave a maximum of 0.6 parts per million of cyanide –ie, hardly a trace:www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/polish/institute-for-forensic-research/table-th...

[8] www.rense.com/general53/aauz.htm, www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p23_Weber.html Staglich, p.265.

[9] http://judicial-inc.biz/Auschwitz.htm

[10] Dittlieb Felderer, Anne Frank’s diary a Hoax, IHR CA 1979, p.1; www.radioislam.org/annefrank/.

[11] In the German endlosung, ‘end’ signifies ‘goal’ and ‘aim’, at least as much as ‘final.’

[12] The minutes of the Wannsee Conference (Berlin, 20th January 1942) provide ‘unambiguous documentary evidence that no extermination program existed:’ Butz, p.212;. For its text, see Staeglich (ref 12), Appendix I.

[13] Butz p.233.

[14] Quoted by Zundel, www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/022_jam.html

[15] 24 March 1933: www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm, http://k0nsl.com/k0nsl/detox/Judea1.html Daily Express headline, ‘Judea declares war on Germany;’ then again, on 5th Sept 1939 (8th Sept, Jewish Chronicle) “The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany … holy war against Hitler’s people” declared by Chain Weizmann, Zionist leader: Six Million (ref 12) p.4; , For Those Who Cannot Speak M. McLaughlin, Historical Review Press 1979 p.17. Staeglich, p.57.

[16] On June 17th 1942, Hitler remarked: ‘One could found a state of Israel in Madagascar,’ (Six Million, p.5) suggesting that the National-Socialist ‘final solution’ was then still viewed as feasible. Many ‘Zionists’ for whom Palestine was unfeasible looked at Madagascar.

[17] Dissecting (ref. 19), p.38. n.119.

[18] Léon Poliakov, Harvest of Hate, 1979.

[19] Social Democracy Now website http://www.blogigo.co.uk/socialdemocracynow/accuse-indictment-academic-h... (February, 2006).

[20] See Butz’ discussion of this Report (ref 13), p. 142ff.

[21] Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross WW2, 1948, Vol.3. www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735

[22] General Eisenhower may have alluded to the subject, in one paragraph: after the war he visited a ‘horror camp’ near Gotha, where he saw evidence of ‘Nazi brutality’. D. Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe, 1948, p.408.

[23] Dissecting, p.289.

[24] Irving, Nuremberg, p.188 n.16, for absence of German ‘holocaust’ documents.

[25] Steiglich, ref. 12.

[26] British Intelligence in World War Two, HMSO, 1981 F.Hinsey Ed., Vol. II, p.673.

[27] Dissecting (ref 19), p.406.

[28] There were a network of labour camps around the small town of Auschwitz and this figure would be their total population. The gas-chamber allegations centred on the Birkenau (Auschwitz II) camp. British-intelligence estimate of 20,000 population (ref. 37) must have been for just one camp. Kramer’s statement alluded to the gassing stories: ‘All I can say is that it is untrue from beginning to end.’ Butz (ref 12), p.265.

[29] For discussion of an alleged statement by Himmler concerning extermination, see Butz (ref.13) p.193.

[30] J. C. Ball, Air Photo Evidence, www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndaerial.html

[31] www.ihr.org/leaflets/auschwitz.shtml www.ihr.org/books/kulaszka/21herwaarden.html

[32] Abrams, Voices from the Holocaust p.196

[33] In the Anne Frank ‘Diary’, she gets to hear in October 1942 about Jews going to gas-chambers, solely via the ‘English radio: The Diary of Anne Frank, Pan 1989, pp.43, 130; Felderer (ref. 11), p.13.

[34] www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p261_Lindsey.html. The story appears in a 1944 War Refugee Board report German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau, Washington, Executive office of the President, the WRB being ‘an instrument of the World Jewish congress:’ Butz p.66-7; Staglich p.93-8.

[35] Butz, p.174.

[36] “The whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us with the help of our Polish comrades… It is no exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda, which was spread at that time all over the world, was written by ourselves in the camp…." Bruno Baum, communist’ (Dissecting, p.115).

[37] www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndfaurpref.html

[38] David Irving, Nuremberg the Last battle (1996): US judge Robert Jackson was initially advised of the ‘six million’ figure by influential Jews: ‘Chapter 4, The Origin of six Million.’

[39] ‘All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:’ 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.

[40] Höss spoke these words to Moritz von Schirmeister in a car on his way to Nurnberg on 1st April, 1946: www.rense.com/general68/Höss.htm. Faurisson states that Bernard Clarke, Höss’s chief torturer, was Jewish, but this is not in Butler’s book. Irving (ref 47), p.241.

[41] Rupert Butler, Legions of Death 1983, pp.237-8; Dissecting, p.96; Staeglich (ref. 12), pp.193-216.

[42] The letter is preserved: Irving, Nuremberg, p.246.

[43] Patricia Meehan, A Strange Enemy People: Germans under the British 1945-50, 2001.

[44] According to The Jewish Chronicle, the World Jewish congress ‘had secured the holding of the Nuremberg trials at which it had provided expert advice and much valuable evidence’ (16.12.49): McLaughlin, Nuremberg and other war crime Trials, Historical Review Press, 1979, p.54.

[45] For Zionists occupying top positions at the Nuremberg trials, see Butz (ref 13) p.30.

[46] Ref. (31).

[47] Staeglich, p.52.

[48] Directives for the Use of Prussic Acid (Zyklon) for the Destruction of Vermin (Disinfestation), from US public health authorities: http://www.codoh.com(info)/incon/inconusphr.html http://www.codoh.com(info)/incon/inconzyklon.html

[49] The book, Nazi Mass Murder, a documentary History by Kogon et. al., YUP 1993, Appendix 5 p.244 has a diagram of ‘Krema-II’, averring that a long room ‘is the gas chamber;’ turning to Rudolf 2003, p.92 this room is seen to be a morgue.

[50] Rassinier (ref. 14) p.270.

[51] www.zundelsite.org/

[52] Michael Hoffman, The Great Holocaust Trial, IHR 1985, p.55.

[53] www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndwitness.html

[54] www.ihr.org/newsletters/ihr_update_december_2006.pdf; released, December 2006.

[55] Ref. 19.

[56] www.codoh.com(info)/found/found.html. Academics protested against this search-and-destroy operation:www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Holocaust.html In 2005 G.R. Rudolf deported from America:www.rense.com/general68/scientistgermar.htm.

[57] Zundel was charged for the crime of having promoted the pamphlet Did Six Million Really die? (ref 11) This brilliant pamphlet, banned in many nations, has sold in hundreds of thousands in various languages.

[58] www.zundelsite.org/zundel_persecuted/sept11-06_letter.html

[59] www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/022_jam.html

Link to this article: http://www.codoh.com/newrevoices/nrillusion.html

-------------------

The Jewish Chronicle, London, 25/04/2008 - http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=59657&ATypeId=1

Maurice Pinay Blog: Rabbi Admits to 'Holocaust' 'Torah' Scam

Maurice Pinay Blog: Rabbi Admits to 'Holocaust' 'Torah' Scam

Rabbi Admits to 'Holocaust' 'Torah' Scam

Holocaustolators are the most credulous of all true believers.

Rabbi Menachem Youlus admits to Torah scam and faces jail

Duped investors into believing he found scrolls at Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen Holocaust camps

By Robert Gearty AND Tracy Connor / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

February 2, 2012

A rabbi who proclaimed himself the “Jewish Indiana Jones” admitted Thursday he was really the villain in a made-for-Hollywood swindle.

Menachem Youlus, a Baltimore bookstore owner, pleaded guilty in Manhattan Federal Court to spinning a web of lies that snared a billionaire philanthropist.

He faces up to five years in prison for creating a bogus charity built on fictional tales of rescuing Holocaust-era Torahs, selling forgeries and pocketing the dough.

“I know what I did was wrong and I deeply regret my conduct,” Youlus said in court.

His lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, said the plea deal “ends an agonizing voyage by a good man with the best of intentions who ultimately strayed into fraudulent conduct.”

Prosecutors had charged Youlus, 50, with weaving fantastical tales of international derring-do to impress donors to his charity.

He claimed to have used a metal detector to unearth a metal box with Torah scrolls on the grounds of the Auschwitz concentration camp.

He sold the supposed relic to investor David Rubenstein, who donated them to the Central Synagogue in Manhattan, and tried to soak him for a $250,000 donation, court papers say.

Youlus also convinced a buyer that he found a Torah at the Bergen-Belsen camp by telling a ridiculous account of stumbling onto a hole in the corner of the floorboards.

He used the money to pay private school tuition bills for his kids and to make personal investments.

As part of his plea agreement, he will repay his victims $1.2 million. He is free on $100,000 bond until his June 21 sentencing.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara noted that Youlus had “exploited the profound emotions attached to one of the most painful chapters in world history — the Holocaust — in order to make a profit.

“Today’s guilty plea is a fitting conclusion to his story and he will now be punished for his brazen fraud.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/rabbi-menachem-youlus-admits-torah-scam-faces-jail-article-1.1016263#ixzz1lKBQEbpp

Also see:

'Holocaust' Huckster Brings His Travelin' Show to Kiev